GE11 (2004) — Malaysian Politics

Abdullah Badawi's high-water mark; BN's largest-ever share of seats.

21 March 2004219 seats110 for a majority

“Alliance/BN” held 198 of 219 seats — past the 110 needed to govern.

Alliance/BN198

PR/PH13

PAS-led7

Other1

There is no seat-by-seat map for this election: the open dataset behind those maps only goes back to 2008. The chamber above comes from a checked historical table.

the road to this election

Abdullah Ahmad Badawi had become Prime Minister in October 2003 after Mahathir Mohamad stepped down. On 4 March 2004, Parliament was dissolved, and the campaign ran for eight days between nominations on 13 March and polling on 21 March.

BN presented a programme centred on development, public-service delivery, police integrity, safety and education. Its religious-policy language included *Islam Hadhari*, while Barisan Alternatif’s PAS–KeADILan manifesto addressed rights, religion and culture, development, employment, and proposals concerning detention without trial and restrictive laws.

The outcome declared on election day was 198 seats for BN, 12 for the DAP, seven for PAS, one for KeADILan (Parti Keadilan Rakyat) and one independent. DAP and KeADILan contested as separate parties: DAP had withdrawn from the Barisan Alternatif alliance before this election, leaving PAS and KeADILan in it, and Moten and Mokhtar record that in several constituencies DAP and KeADILan candidates stood against each other. Relative to 1999, BN’s seat total rose from 148 to 198 in a larger chamber, while PAS’s representation fell from 27 to seven; DAP rose from 10 to 12 and KeADILan went from five to one.

One petition later changed that arithmetic. On 23 June 2004 the Kelantan High Court reversed the Pasir Puteh result because the Election Commission had named the wrong winner, giving the seat to BN. The post-petition composition of the House was therefore BN 199 and PAS six.

BN remained the federal government and Abdullah was sworn in as Prime Minister on 22 March 2004.

the working

What the sources say

9 claims, each carrying the certainty label written beside it in the knowledge base, and the source it came from.

established

Parliament was dissolved on 4 March 2004 on Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi’s advice; nominations were held on 13 March, followed by an eight-day campaign before polling on 21 March. Abdullah had succeeded Mahathir Mohamad in October 2003 and was seeking his first electoral mandate as Prime Minister.

Abdul Rashid Moten and Tunku Mohar Mokhtar

established

BN’s campaign promised economic development, improvements to public services and police integrity, personal safety, education, and *Islam Hadhari* (“Progressive Islam”); its manifesto focused particularly on agriculture, biotechnology and Islamic financial services.

Abdul Rashid Moten and Tunku Mohar Mokhtar

established

The Barisan Alternatif alliance of PAS and KeADILan campaigned on rights, religion and culture, development, health, education, business, employment and the environment; it also proposed ending detention without trial and reviewing restrictive laws.

Abdul Rashid Moten and Tunku Mohar Mokhtar

established

On the results declared on election day, BN won 198 of 219 parliamentary seats; DAP won 12, PAS seven, PKR one, and an independent won one.

ElectionData.MY

adjudicated

Forty election petitions were filed challenging the declared results. One succeeded: on 23 June 2004 the Kelantan High Court reversed the declared result in the Pasir Puteh parliamentary constituency on the ground that the Election Commission had declared the wrong winner, and BN was declared the winner in its place. All other petitions in Kelantan, and nine in Terengganu, were rejected.

Abdul Rashid Moten and Tunku Mohar Mokhtar

adjudicated

The Election Court declared BN candidate Che Min Che Ahmad the winner of Pasir Puteh after nullifying the election-night declaration that PAS candidate Kalthom Othman had won.

The Star

established

After that petition, the composition of the Dewan Rakyat was BN 199, DAP 12, PAS six, PKR one and one independent. This is the distribution the Inter-Parliamentary Union records on the authority of the Dewan Rakyat itself, and it is why sources published later give BN 199 rather than 198.

Abdul Rashid Moten and Tunku Mohar Mokhtar Inter-Parliamentary Union

established

Compared with 1999, when BN won 148 of 193 seats, the 2004 election-day result increased BN’s seat total to 198 in an enlarged 219-seat chamber. PAS went from 27 seats to seven, DAP from 10 to 12, and KeADILan (by then Parti Keadilan Rakyat) from five to one.

Julian C. H. Lee

established

Abdullah was sworn in as Prime Minister on 22 March 2004; the newly elected Dewan Rakyat first sat on 17 May.

Inter-Parliamentary Union

where accounts differ

Why it turned out this way — and who says so

Explanations for an election result are arguments, not facts. Each of these is attributed to the person or study that made it, and set beside the others without a winner being picked.

Whether the electoral process affected the result

contested

PAS and KeADILan alleged irregularities including electoral-roll problems, and called for investigations and fresh elections under an independent Election Commission. The Election Commission chairman accepted responsibility for the Selangor voting delay but said the problems were implementation failures rather than deliberate policy. On the government and Election Commission side, the record shows the following. The Commission extended voting by two hours in Selangor after names went missing from the rolls, and separately nullified the vote in one Pahang state seat and re-ran it on 28 March after party symbols were mixed up on the ballot papers. Chairman Abdul Rashid Abdul Rahman was reported as saying he would not step down. Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi did not defend the Commission: he criticised it over the problems and ordered an investigation. Beyond these administrative responses, no contemporaneous government or Election Commission rebuttal of the broader argument — that media access, funding and institutional arrangements themselves favoured BN — was found for this page. That side of the argument does not appear to be on the accessible English-language record, rather than having been searched for and found weak.

how this is labelled: contested — opposition parties’ account; contested — Election Commission chairman’s account; established

Abdul Rashid Moten and Tunku Mohar Mokhtar Abdul Rashid Moten and Tunku Mohar Mokhtar AFP via Al Jazeera

How far the result reflected voter choice rather than electoral conditions

contested

Abdul Rashid Moten and Tunku Mohar Mokhtar interpreted the outcome as support for Abdullah’s moderate governance, anti-corruption agenda, economic conditions and BN’s campaign. Julian C. H. Lee argued that seat totals should not be read alone because electoral rules, institutions and media conditions disadvantaged opposition parties.

how this is labelled: contested — these authors’ retrospective academic framing; contested — Lee’s retrospective academic framing

Abdul Rashid Moten and Tunku Mohar Mokhtar Julian C. H. Lee

Abdullah’s personal standing and agenda, the “Badawi factor”

contested

Three distinct claims are usually run together here, and they come from three different places. First, BN’s own claim: its secretary-general, quoted in *The Star* on 22 March 2004, said the win was “99.9% due to Abdullah Badawi”. Second, the academic reading: Abdul Rashid Moten and Tunku Mohar Mokhtar argue that Abdullah had built public credit through high-profile corruption prosecutions, a Royal Commission of Inquiry into the police, and a non-confrontational campaign style. Third, survey evidence: a post-election Merdeka Center for Opinion Research poll of 1,017 respondents found 42% saying they voted BN because of its promise of material development, 32% describing Abdullah as a “man of the people”, 22% as having a “clean image”, and 19% in terms of his religious background.

how this is labelled: contested — BN’s own account, the speaker unnamed in the source; contested — these authors’ retrospective academic framing; established — as a survey finding; it measures what respondents said, not why the seats fell as they did

Abdul Rashid Moten and Tunku Mohar Mokhtar

contested

advanced by Abdul Rashid Moten and Tunku Mohar Mokhtar. They cite 2003 GDP growth, the BN’s campaign resources, and divisions following DAP’s departure from Barisan Alternatif, as well as tensions among opposition parties.

how this is labelled: contested — these authors’ retrospective academic framing

Abdul Rashid Moten and Tunku Mohar Mokhtar

contested

advanced by the Inter-Parliamentary Union’s contemporary election summary and by S. A. Jayasankaran as quoted by Julian C. H. Lee. The IPU summary reported that, “according to political analysts”, many voters, especially the Chinese and Indian minorities, feared Islamic fundamentalism; the IPU does not name those analysts, and this page cannot say who they were or on what evidence they said it. Lee separately records S. A. Jayasankaran of the *Far Eastern Economic Review* writing that voters “rejected the Islamic conservatism of Pas”, which is one named journalist’s reading rather than a measured finding.

how this is labelled: contested — contemporaneous analyst/reporting framing

Inter-Parliamentary Union Julian C. H. Lee

contested

advanced by Abdul Rashid Moten and Tunku Mohar Mokhtar, and separately by Julian C. H. Lee. Moten and Mokhtar argue that BN benefited from money, party machinery and media access; Lee argues that institutional arrangements and uneven enforcement constrained opposition participation.

how this is labelled: contested — these academics’ framing

Abdul Rashid Moten and Tunku Mohar Mokhtar Julian C. H. Lee

still being researched

What this page does not yet know

Whether any contemporaneous government, BN or Election Commission answer exists to the argument that media access, campaign funding and institutional arrangements themselves favoured BN in 2004. The criticisms are on the record from named academics; a substantive reply from the other side was not found. A Malay-language source, a Bernama wire item or a parliamentary record may hold one.

← GE10 (1999)GE12 (2008) →